Tiger Woods' son is in the spotlight for a big win. Jack Nicklaus says a tough road lies aheadNew Foto - Tiger Woods' son is in the spotlight for a big win. Jack Nicklaus says a tough road lies ahead

Golf is hard enough without having a famous father who set a standard hard to match even by the very best. Tiger Woods is certain to watch that unfold over the next several years. Jack Nicklaus already has seen it. A few hours before Scottie Schefflerset out to win the Memorial for the second straight year, Nicklaus was asked about another big win that week. Charlie Woods, the 16-year-old son of the biggest name in golf, won his first American Junior Golf Association title. It's a wonder which win — Scheffler or Woods — got more attention on social media. "I think it's tough on kids," Nicklaus said, speaking from experience. His oldest son, Jackie, won the prestigious North & South Amateur at Pinehurst and played his college golf at North Carolina. That was nothing compared with his third-oldest son. Long before Gary Nicklaus became the only one of the four golden cubs to earn a PGA Tour card, he made the cover of Sports Illustrated. He was 16. "The Next Nicklaus," said the headline. The father remembers it clearly. "It ran him out of golf," Nicklaus said. Some context is required. Gary Nicklaus played four years at Ohio State (one title), earned a European tour card and got through Q-school in 1999 to earn a PGA Tour card. But Nicklaus felt the publicity was too much for his son at that age. "Gary would get off the 18th and run to the car so he didn't have to talk to the press for about two years," he said. "Sports Illustrated said they wanted to do a story. We said, 'No cover, none of that.' They put it right on the cover. It was not nice what they did." Nicklaus also thought the publicity was over the top when his grandson, G.T., made an ace in the Par 3 Contest before the 2018 Masters. "That's the kind of things you've really got to try to avoid with kids," he said. "It's difficult for them. It's even tougher today. Charlie is a nice little player. He's got a beautiful little golf swing. Does he want to follow his father? Does he realize what's going on?" Woods was in the Detroit area last summer when his son qualified for the U.S. Junior Amateur.Charlie attracted the largest gallery, said to be 10 times the size of a normal crowd for that event. Or were they there to see his father? Nicklaus knows that feeling, too. "Gary would always say, 'I wonder how many people are going to come out watching my father watch me?" Nicklaus said with a chuckle. He doesn't know much about Charlie Woods except for what he occasionally sees on television, and Nicklaus is impressed with the swing. A lot of juniors have great swings. The depth today at the highest levels of golf is evident long before these kids start getting courtesy cars. Charlie Woods made his TV debut at age 11 in the PNC Championship, the tournament that pairs major champions with a family member. The son has grown, matured and, after two years, Woods allowed Charlie to join him in post-round interviews, as the rest of the field does. He handled that well, too. It is not unusual for sons to follow their fathers in golf, but matching success is rare. Old Tom and Young Tom Morris (each won the British Open four times) were the exception. The art is letting the children discover the joy of the game and motivation to compete. "My kids played because they wanted to play, not because I wanted them to play," Nicklaus said. "That was sort of my rule of the house. Don't play golf because of me, play golf because that's what you want to do. That's what they wanted to do. "Then they figured out over a period of time they weren't going to get to where they wanted to get, and they decided to do other things." Woods was renowned for dominating at every age group as he worked his way into the record book with three straight U.S. Juniors and three straight U.S. Amateurs. As feats go, it's up there with his 142 cuts in a row and his 15-shot victory in the U.S. Open. He didn't try to qualify for his first U.S. Open until he was exempt through the first stage when he was 16. He shot 151 at Lake Merced in San Francisco and failed to get to Pebble Beach for the 1992 U.S. Open. Charlie Woods has tried two U.S. Open qualifiersand has yet to get out of the first stage. He's trying. He's competing. His father, by all accounts, is giving him space in a culture where that doesn't often allow for that. "I just am always reminding him, 'Just be you,'" Woods said last year at thePNC Championship. "Charlie is Charlie. Yes, he's my son. He's going to have the last name and he's going to be part of the sport. But I just want him to be himself and just be your own person. That's what we will always focus on. I will always encourage it, for him to carve his own name, carve his own path and have his own journey." The father knows better than anyone it's no small task. Every time Charlie plays a junior tournament, cameras — usually phones — are sure to follow, especially when Woods is around. "In this day and age where you have so many different ... everyone is basically media with all the phones," Woods said. "Being constantly filmed and people watching him, that's just part of his generation, and that's part of the world that he has to maneuver through. I try and do the best job I possibly can as a parent. I'm always here for him. "But at the end of the day, I just want him just to be himself and have his own life." As the son of Tiger Woods, that might be tougher than golf itself. ___ AP golf:https://apnews.com/hub/golf

Tiger Woods' son is in the spotlight for a big win. Jack Nicklaus says a tough road lies ahead

Tiger Woods' son is in the spotlight for a big win. Jack Nicklaus says a tough road lies ahead Golf is hard enough without having a famo...
Is Caitlin Clark playing today? Latest injury updates on Indiana Fever starNew Foto - Is Caitlin Clark playing today? Latest injury updates on Indiana Fever star

TheIndiana Feverare set to face theWashington Mysticsfor the second time in less than a week in WNBA regular-season action, and it will also be the second time in less than a week that Fever starCaitlin Clarkwill be relegated to watching the two teams play from the sideline. Clark is on the verge of missing a third game in a row due to a quad injury she suffered inthe Fever's 90-88 loss to the the defending WNBA champion New York Libertyon May 24. Even worse is that the team's injury woes have only gotten worse, and Indiana (2-4) will ride a three-game losing skid into its rematch with the Mystics (3-4) at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.Washington beat the Fever, 83-77, in the first game after Clark's injury. Here's what to know about Clark's status for Tuesday's game against the Mystics and her timeline to return to the court: WNBA MVP ODDS:Power ranking early-season favorites for 2025 season Clark is not expected to play in the Fever's rematch against the Mystics on Tuesday, June 3. It will be the third game in a row she misses while dealing with a left quad strain. This is the first time during Clark's college or professional careers she has missed games due to injury. She played 139 games while at Iowa and 46 games during her first season-plus with the Fever. The Fever initially announcedon May 26 that Clark is expected to miss a minimum of two weeks while recovering from a left quad strain. Based on the timeline, she would also miss at least Saturday's rematch with Angel Reese and the Chicago Sky. Her first potential return game is Tuesday, June 10 against the Atlanta Dream. "I don't know when it happened," Fever coach Stephanie White said of the injury, according tothe Indianapolis Star. "I know (after the Liberty game) we got a message that something was going on with her leg and they were getting an MRI, and then we got the word." White clarified Clark's injury is a new one and not an aggravation of the left quad injury that caused the star point guard to miss a preseason game against the Mystics. The Fever were subsequentlyforced to sign guard Aari McDonald Monday via an emergency hardship exception. Sophie Cunningham and Sydney Colson were injured inthe team's loss to the Connecticut Sunlast Friday. Though Clark can't play for the Fever at the moment,she did sit courtsidewith teammates Aliyah Boston and Lexie Hull when theIndiana Pacersclosed out the New York Knicks in Game 6 of the NBA Eastern Conference Finals last Saturday. CAITLIN CLARK INJURY:Ticket prices drastically fall with Indiana Fever star out Clark is the Fever's leading scorer and leads the WNBA in assists per game to start the 2025 season. Here's a look at the 2024 Rookie of the Year's full stats per game: Minutes: 35 Points: 19 Rebounds: 6 Assists: 9.3 Steals: 1.3 Blocks: 1 Turnovers: 5 FG%: 40.3 3P%: 31.4 This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Caitlin Clark injury update: Is Fever star playing today vs Mystics?

Is Caitlin Clark playing today? Latest injury updates on Indiana Fever star

Is Caitlin Clark playing today? Latest injury updates on Indiana Fever star TheIndiana Feverare set to face theWashington Mysticsfor the sec...
Swimming world body to banish athletes and supporters of doping-fueled event in Las VegasNew Foto - Swimming world body to banish athletes and supporters of doping-fueled event in Las Vegas

LAUSANNE, Switzerland (AP) — Swimmers and officials who compete in and support a doping-fueled sports event planned in Las Vegas will be banished from the sport, the governing body World Aquatics said on Tuesday. Organizers of theEnhanced Gamesscheduled next May promise $1 million bonuses for athletes who beat world record times over sprint distances in the pool or on the track. Weightlifting also is on the program. A small group of past Olympic swimmers, including three-time medalist James Magnussen of Australia, are among athletes who signed up for the event that aims to push limits beyond the rules of clean sport. "Those who enable doped sport are not welcome at World Aquatics or our events," its president Husain al-Musallam said in a statement after the decision. Thenew ruletargets those who "support, endorse, or participate in sporting events that embrace the use of scientific advancements or other practices that may include prohibited substances and/or prohibited methods," the world swim body said. "This ineligibility would apply to roles such as athlete, coach, team official, administrator, medical support staff, or government representative." Enhanced Games organizers had a launch event last month for the inaugural event at a Vegas resort, with plans for a year-round training base. Athletes are not subject to doping tests though they should have their health monitored. The project also involves selling personalized programs of supplements and substances to people who pay a refundable $99 deposit. One investment group isbacked by Donald Trump Jr. The World Anti-Doping Agency has criticized the idea first touted in 2023 as dangerous and irresponsible. ___ AP sports:https://apnews.com/sports

Swimming world body to banish athletes and supporters of doping-fueled event in Las Vegas

Swimming world body to banish athletes and supporters of doping-fueled event in Las Vegas LAUSANNE, Switzerland (AP) — Swimmers and official...
Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to big tax billNew Foto - Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to big tax bill

WASHINGTON −President Donald Trumpis lashing out at Republican Sen. Rand Paul, saying his own constituents "can't stand him" over the Kentucky senator's continued opposition tohis tax and domestic policy billthat Trump and GOP leaders are trying to push through the Senate this month. Trump targeted Paul in back-to-back June 3 posts on Truth Social, just minutes after Paul discussed his opposition in a morning appearance on Fox Business by arguing the president's so-called "big, beautiful bill" will increase the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. "Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming,"Trump wrote. "He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!" More:Trump's big tax bill moves ahead to potential changes in the Senate Five minutes later,Trump added in a second post: "Rand votes NO on everything, but never has any practical or constructive ideas. His ideas are actually crazy (losers!). The people of Kentucky can't stand him. This is a BIG GROWTH BILL!" The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the bill, which looks to cement the president's domestic agenda, would add$3.8 trillionto the national debt over the next 10 years. Trump has said he wants Congress to approve the legislation and get it to his desk by July 4after the House voted for the bill along party lineslast month. More:Sen. Rand Paul dismisses GOP budget bill's spending cuts as 'wimpy and anemic' Republican leaders are trying to pass the Senate bill through a filibuster-proof budget process known as reconciliation. It would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, implement new tax breaks for tipped wages and overtime, overhaul Medicaid and food stamps and put more money toward Trump's immigrant deportation plan. Paul,in the Fox Business interview, pointed to spending proposals for $175 billion on border enforcement and a $150 billion increase for the military. He said it would offset the cutsthe Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiencymade in the group's push to cut the government. "Something doesn't really add up here,"Paul said. "And I can't be on record as being one who supports increasing the debt by $5 trillion. I think that's irresponsible." Trump warned Paul in a May 31 Truth Social postthat he would be "playing right into the hands of the Democrats"if he votes against the bill. Paul, who has also criticized Trump's aggressive use of tariffs,said on CBS' Face the Nation on June 1that he recently spoke to Trump. "I had a very good conversation with the president this week about tariffs. He did most of the talking, and we don't agree exactly on the outcome." Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate, meaning Trump can lose no more than three Republican senators to pass the bill if no Democrats cross the aisle to support the legislation. In addition to Republicans like Paul worried about the deficit, Trump must alsoease concerns over potential changesto Medicaid voiced by Republican Sens.Susan Collins of Maineand Josh Hawley of Missouri. The bill would cut $625 billion from the low-income health care program while pushing an estimated 7.6 million Americans off coverage, in part by implementing new work requirements for able-bodied adults without children. Other senators such as Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska; John Curtis, R-Utah; and Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, are worried about the package rolling back renewable energy tax credits implemented under Democrats' Inflation Reduction Act that their states' businesses have benefited from. Contributing: Riley Beggin Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to tax bill

Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to big tax bill

Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to big tax bill WASHINGTON −President Donald Trumpis lashing out at Republican Sen. Rand ...
Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the statesNew Foto - Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the states

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — PresidentDonald Trumpand congressional Republicans have made it a priority this year to require people to prove citizenship before they can register to vote. Turning that aspiration into reality has proved difficult. Trump'sexecutive orderdirecting a documentary,proof-of-citizenship requirementfor federal elections has beenblockedby a judge, whilefederal legislationto accomplish it doesn't appear to have the votes to pass in the Senate. At the same time, state-level efforts have found little success, even in places where Republicans control the legislature and governor's office. The most recent state effort to falter is in Texas, where a Senate bill failed to gain full legislative approval before lawmakers adjourned on Monday. The Texas bill was one of the nation's most sweeping proof-of-citizenship proposals because it would have applied not only to new registrants but also to the state's roughly 18.6 million registered voters. "The bill authors failed spectacularly to explain how this bill would be implemented and how it would be able to be implemented without inconveniencing a ton of voters," said Anthony Gutierrez, director of the voting rights group Common Cause Texas. Voting by noncitizens is rare Voting by noncitizens is already illegal and punishable as a felony, potentially leading to deportation, but Trump and his allies have pressed for aproof-of-citizenship mandateby arguing it would improve public confidence in elections. Before his win last year, Trumpfalsely claimednoncitizensmight votein large enough numbers tosway the outcome. Although noncitizen voting does occur, research andreviews of state caseshas shown itto be rareand more often a mistake. Voting rights groups say the various proposals seeking to require proof-of-citizenship areoverly burdensomeand threaten to disenfranchise millions of Americans. Many do not have easy access to their birth certificates, have not gotten a U.S. passport or have a name that no longer matches the one on their birth certificate — such as women who changed their last name when they married. Married women who changed names are a particular concern The number of states considering bills related to proof of citizenship for voting tripled from 2023 to this year, said Liz Avore, senior policy adviser with the Voting Rights Lab, an advocacy group that tracks election legislation in the states. That hasn't resulted in many new laws, at least so far. Republicans in Wyoming passed their own proof-of-citizenship legislation, but similar measures have stalled or failed in multiple GOP-led states, including Florida, Missouri, Texas and Utah. A proposal remains active in Ohio, although Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, has said he doesn't want to sign any more bills that make it harder to vote. In Texas, the legislation swiftly passed the state Senate after it was introduced in March but never made it to a floor vote in the House. It was unclear why legislation that was such a priority for Senate Republicans – every one of them co-authored the bill -- ended up faltering. "I just think people realized, as flawed as this playbook has been in other states, Texas didn't need to make this mistake," said Rep. John Bucy, a Democrat who serves as vice chair of the House elections committee. Bucy pointed to specific concerns about married women who changed their last name. This surfaced in local elections earlier this yearin New Hampshire, which passed a proof-of-citizenship requirement last year. Similar laws have created confusion Other states that previously sought to add such a requirement have faced lawsuits and complications when trying to implement it. In Arizona, a state audit found that problems with the way data was handled had affected the tracking and verification of residents' citizenship status. It came after officials had identifiedsome 200,000 voterswho were thought to have provided proof of their citizenship but had not. A proof-of-citizenship requirement was in effect for three yearsin Kansasbefore it was overturned by federal courts. The state's own expert estimated that almost all of the roughly 30,000 people who were prevented from registering to vote while it was in effect were U.S. citizens who otherwise had been eligible. In Missouri, legislation seeking to add a proof-of-citizenship requirement cleared a Senate committee but never came to a vote in the Republican-led chamber. Republican state Sen. Ben Brown had promoted the legislation as a follow-up to a constitutional amendment stating that only U.S. citizens can vote, which Missouri voters overwhelmingly approved last November. He said there were several factors that led to the bill not advancing this year. Due to the session's limited schedule, he chose to prioritize another elections bill banning foreign contributions in state ballot measure campaigns. "Our legislative session ending mid-May means a lot of things die at the finish line because you simply run out of time," Brown said, noting he also took time to research concerns raised by local election officials and plans to reintroduce the proof-of-citizenship bill next year. Complications prompt states to focus on other issues The Republican-controlled Legislature in Utah also prioritized other election changes, adding voter ID requirements and requiring people toopt in to receivetheir ballots in the mail. Before Gov. Spencer Cox signed the bill into law, Utah was the only Republican-controlled state that allowed all elections to be conducted by mail without a need to opt in. Under the Florida bill that has failed to advance, voter registration applications wouldn't be considered valid until state officials had verified citizenship, either by confirming a previous voting history, checking the applicant's status in state and federal databases, or verifying documents they provided. The bill would have required voters to prove their citizenship even when updating their registration to change their address or party affiliation. Its sponsor, Republican state Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka, said it was meant to follow through on Trump's executive order: "This bill fully answers the president's call," she said. ___ Cassidy reported from Atlanta. Associated Press writers Mead Gruver in Cheyenne, Wyoming; David A. Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; Hannah Schoenbaum in Salt Lake City; Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio; and Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, contributed to this report.

Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the states

Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the states AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — PresidentDonald Trumpand congression...

 

ANIO DACK © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com